IMO every team cooking xyz brand meat does not level the playing field as much as it sounds. The teams that consistently finish near the top, would continue to do so. I have seen that it's not the pit, type of fuel, rub, injection, meat, etc as much as it is the amount of time spent practicing and cooking contests that make the most difference. When we cooked more contests, we held our own using club butts, ribs, and grocery store chicken. People will still come up with reasons why they didn't finish as well as they think they should. Ex.How can they be competitive cooking on grills when others as using jambos? Why not make all teams use the same cookers, fuel,rubs, sauce etc. If a contest goes this route, I doubt they are going draw more "experienced/bigger name/more competitive" teams. It would be tough to find teams willing to invest the time and money and give up any competitive advantage they feel they have with using their own meat. And if a contest is not drawing these teams, its probably going to have a tough time generating sponsorship and public appeal. Running a contest off of entry fees alone has got to be very difficult to pull off. Granted, there will be exceptions to make everything I just said a bunch of hot air. It's maybe a good idea to attract newer/less experienced/more social then competitive teams. I see a tough balancing act for comps to provide meat and keep entries fees low and payouts high enough to keep teams coming back. Undoubtedly, they will need to provide value added extras that don't have much cost to them. No doubt it can be done, but it would take an exceptional group to make it work. Just my opinion.