I have to agree with the article,... to an extent. I agree that wood has to be used in order to make real BBQ and I happen to use nothing but wood to cook with but to say that using a charcoal cooker with wood chunks isn't "real" BBQ would be a mistake. An electric smoker using wood chips can create a very nice product as can a gas cooker or any other that uses an alternative fuel source for heat as long as the flavor is from burning wood in SOME form.
The source of the heat is not important, only the source of the flavor that is imparted to the food. I use a stick burner and I personally think that the flavor and quality of the finished product from that type of cooker is unmatched but an insulated cooker run with a good clean burning lump and some wood chunks makes some pretty good Q as well and we all choose our cookers for personal reasons including time for cooking and space to put a cooker or what kind of cooker the HOA or building management will even allow!
Real BBQ is a meat that is slowly cooked with real wood smoke for flavor. As long as the smoke flavor isn't coming from a bottle or a seasoning of some kind, it's the real thing in my opinion.:wink:
Looks right to me! 5-7 wouldn't even make my list but otherwise I'd say you're spot on!:thumb:I'd put the complexity of flavors and quality of Q from cookers types in this order.
1A- Stick burners
1B- cooking over hot coals (charcoal or coals from logs) open pits, UDS etc..
2) WSM with the water pan installed, cabinet smokers- cookers that are just indirect heat from charcoal and wood chunks.
3) propane with chips/ chunks
4) electric with chips
5) cookers with liquid smoke
6) gas ovens
7) electric ovens
Looks right to me! 5-7 wouldn't even make my list but otherwise I'd say you're spot on!:thumb:
I call bull ****! She is a moron. I am so sick of that is bbq that is not bbq. If you want to get technical it should be made in a pit a real hand dug pit and it should be covered with leaves and burried in dirt. Bbq has evolved and has branched out in a lot of directions. Are you really going to agree that the guy who cooks with charcoal in a WSM or an ugly drum smoker or a pellet grill or whatever fuel or smoker you use is not real bbq? The words real or authentic bbq are a load of crap. There is no such thing as authentic or real bbq. Bbq is always evolving. Certain parts of bbq are new but it is still bbq.
I am sorry and I beg to differ but being that I own and cook on both types of cookers the offset delivers a more consistant bark and more complex flavor profile IMHO. Don't get me wrong my Vision Kamado and My SF Offset are both great cookers. If I could get the same results however, I would not bother loading up all the fuel needed to cook on my offset. Big bold beef goes on the offset no doubt. Butts, Chicken, Fish, Pizza, and steaks go on what is the most approriate sized cooker for the amount of food I am cooking.Well said...all you people that say "real bbq" is only achieved with wood are kidding yourself. In fact, I bet I can cook a butt on my ceramic grill using chunk charcoal and chunks of wood and then cook the same flavor profile over an all wood offset smoker and 10 out 10 people will have a 50% chance of guessing right. Because that's just what it would be....a guess.
I'd put the complexity of flavors and quality of Q from cookers types in this order.
1A- Stick burners
1B- cooking over hot coals (charcoal or coals from logs) open pits, UDS etc..
2) WSM with the water pan installed, cabinet smokers- cookers that are just indirect heat from charcoal and wood chunks.
3) propane with chips/ chunks
4) electric with chips
(not really Q)
5) cookers with liquid smoke
6) gas ovens
7) electric ovens
Well, figure out how to get some wood smoke in there and maybe!How about #8. Microwave oven
I think where the back and forth comes in is between personal taste and what the truer definition of what real BBQ is. That list is where i'd put the truest BBQ top to bottom is all and how i'd list complexity of flavors. That said sure you can get good taste from a gasser...my personal preference is charcoal is all.I like your list, but still think it's a bit misleading when it comes to "quality of Q". The flavor profiles will differ of course, but it's questionable to say that one is better "quality Q" than the other.
My biggest gripe is with the claim that using propane isn't "real Q". That's like saying that when I fire up my Weber gasser and I grill some nice thick Portherhouse steaks, that I'm not really grilling.
Is there a flavor difference between charcoal grills and gas grills ? Sure. Does that mean that you can't put out a good tasting quality product using a gas grill ? OH HELL NO.
Same with smokers. I've tasted lots of "wood only" backyard Q and Q-joint Q that doesn't come close to approaching what I put out with my propane smoker. It's all about knowing what you are doing with the tools that you are using.
I'd put the complexity of flavors and quality of Q from cookers types in this order.
1A- Stick burners
1B- cooking over hot coals (charcoal or coals from logs) open pits, UDS etc..
2) WSM with the water pan installed, cabinet smokers- cookers that are just indirect heat from charcoal and wood chunks.
3) propane with chips/ chunks
4) electric with chips
(not really Q)
5) cookers with liquid smoke
6) gas ovens
7) electric ovens
It doesn't if you're talking using straight wood. Stick burners when operated correctly will produce the cleanest fire because of the heat. Cleaner fires make better food imho. I don't burn sticks currently but i try to make the cleanest burning fire i can because it makes a difference. Also if you're burning 100% wood vs even using lump with wood chunks you'll probably get a tad better flavor with all wood i think.Keith, why do stick burners produce greater flavor complexity than cooking directly over coals (which also features the combustion and smoke from drippings)?
I think where the back and forth comes in is between personal taste and what the truer definition of what real BBQ is.