MeatStreet
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2017
- Location
- Park...
Just got back from a comp and I'm yet again disappointed in the results.
I thought I had the best cook I've ever had for 3/4 of the four meats, but scored 150-160.
The crazy thing is that I had a TERRIBLE cook on my chicken and it scored the best (165). I thought it was flavorless and the presentation was way off, yet it outscored the other three meats handily.
I'm wondering what I can do differently. I've heard a lot of things (cook the most basic bbq, it's a tenderness contest, cook the meat until it's done, etc.), and I believe I cook to those goals to the best extent possible.
So what is it that separates the top ten teams at a comp from the rest? The "same" teams win week in and out.
What is it that they are doing so much differently?
Any advice from those who are winning is appreciated.
I thought I had the best cook I've ever had for 3/4 of the four meats, but scored 150-160.
The crazy thing is that I had a TERRIBLE cook on my chicken and it scored the best (165). I thought it was flavorless and the presentation was way off, yet it outscored the other three meats handily.
I'm wondering what I can do differently. I've heard a lot of things (cook the most basic bbq, it's a tenderness contest, cook the meat until it's done, etc.), and I believe I cook to those goals to the best extent possible.
So what is it that separates the top ten teams at a comp from the rest? The "same" teams win week in and out.
What is it that they are doing so much differently?
Any advice from those who are winning is appreciated.